Theyre all wrong

In todays news, Johnny doesnt know the population of the world. Clever people like me understand what wikipedia is for and that it is 6,671,226,000 It just shows how using his scholarly sources gets him into all kinds of messes and he should use wikipedia instead.

The theology web team have also been proven wrong in asserting how the reserection of Jebus grew out of nowhere. It appears that theyve just found a stone which says that everyone at the time was expecting a rising messiah.

I therefore conclude that it is rational to assume that the theologyweb crew are wrong about everything

why I rule god out from the start

when you consider the existence of flying teapots you rule the existence of them out from the start. The same goes for dragons and pink unicorns. Nobody has a problem with you ruling these things out from the start. So why is it so wrong for people like me to rule out the existence of sky daddies from the start?

Here is the ultimate test. If someone said that they had heard a talking donkey would you laugh at them. I know I would and I'm sure you would to (unless you are the idiot who believes in talking donkeys.) Now most freethinkers and brights would be able to name several passages in the bible where talking donkeys are mentioned. As xians never read their bibles (or if they do they soon loose their faith) they won't realise this. But do you see where i'm going. Ruling out god and talking donkeys from the start and ignoring anything which contradicts atheism is the rational and thinking thing to do.

This might seem obvious however some xians just don't get it.