hello everyone

now why does the bible say its wrong to get drunk i think its quite fun really i got drunk and i can still blog intelligent posts des[pite it. horaay those people who belives in stuff dont kow how to have fun

Sky daddies are illogical

if a sky daddy existed then what did it do before it made the universe? There was nothing before the universe and so it would have had nothing to think about or do. It would have therefore got bored. But if your sky daddy is perfect then how can it get bored. Thus it is impossible for your sky daddy to exist.

What if xians had evidence? A purely theoretical question.

I came across a brilliant argument whilst surfing the Richard Dawkins forums. You sky daddy is complex and therefore anything is more probable than them raising Jebus from the dead. Thus if we can use our imaginations to think of an alternative way of explaing this we are o.k. Now obviously xians havent given us any evidenc whatsoever yet but if they did all the would show is that aliens came down to earth, used superior technology to bring jebus back to life and then disapper again or another explanation. Take you pick as anything i slogically a better xplanation than goddidit

Is paul a myth?

I notice that people question heather jebus existed but should we just take for granted the fact paul existed? how do we know that paul isnt a myth to?

Richard Dawkins is not rude...however xians are

Sometimes xians claim that us atheists are rude however all we do is make the odd humerous comment. Infact, Richard Dawkins has only made such remarks against the real enemies of reason such as william lane craig, dinesh d'susa, Boteach, David Robertson. Xians, on the other hand, get their teachings from the bible and are always saying rude things to Richard Dawkins. If you think otherwise then watch this 30 second video.

Theyre all wrong

In todays news, Johnny doesnt know the population of the world. Clever people like me understand what wikipedia is for and that it is 6,671,226,000 It just shows how using his scholarly sources gets him into all kinds of messes and he should use wikipedia instead.

The theology web team have also been proven wrong in asserting how the reserection of Jebus grew out of nowhere. It appears that theyve just found a stone which says that everyone at the time was expecting a rising messiah.

I therefore conclude that it is rational to assume that the theologyweb crew are wrong about everything

Sam Harris' Survery Results

You might remember that I posted a survery Sam Harris did a while ago. Well here are the results