Evidence before the universe?

xians point to the origin of the universe as evidence for their sky daddy, so does that mean that before the universe was made they had no evidence for their sky dadys existance?

Evidence please

After listening with an open mind to all these xians I find that they havent given me any credible evidence for their sky daddy. Now if they gave me some evidence then ofcourse i would convert however at the moment I see less evidence than for father christmas.

Proof your sky daddy doesn't exist...

If you sky daddy can do anything then can they exist and no exist at once? If they cannot then they cant do anything. If they can then they are illogical

What if xians had evidence? A purely theoretical question.

I came across a brilliant argument whilst surfing the Richard Dawkins forums. You sky daddy is complex and therefore anything is more probable than them raising Jebus from the dead. Thus if we can use our imaginations to think of an alternative way of explaing this we are o.k. Now obviously xians havent given us any evidenc whatsoever yet but if they did all the would show is that aliens came down to earth, used superior technology to bring jebus back to life and then disapper again or another explanation. Take you pick as anything i slogically a better xplanation than goddidit

The bar? what bar?

sometimes people accuse freethinkers of raising the bar everytime xians give us some evidence. Well firstly xians never give us evidence and secondly your sky daddy shouldnt have made it possible to raise the bar. we can ask for as much evidence as bloody well like and if you cant give it to us then your religion is stupid.

reserection evidence blown out of the water (again)

xians often harp on about the evidence for the resurrection however not only have I blown it out of the water someone else has as well. Click here Oh, and thanks to john loftus as well for recommending it on his blog as thats how i found out about it.

Rather than leaving comments on my blog why not leave it on the blog i link to and we can have a massive debate.

Science is the way to go

Why does science rule out the existence of sky daddies? Well science is concerned with the natural, things we can touch see and smell. But religion believes in the supernatural which we cannot see, touch or smell. Sky Daddies by definition are not things we can see, touch or smell and so if you want to believe in science then you have to rule out the existence of sky daddies.

Some might argue that this makes it impossible to prove that sky daddies exist. This is ofcourse nonsense. If you could get a bit of your sky daddy and put it into a test tube, carry out an experiment to show that this is a being who can control the universe called Jebus then i would admit that im wrong straight away. Using xian logic then wed need to say fairies and pink unicorns exist etc etc

Heres a challenge to xians, without using the bible and only using stuff which i can personally see and touch or smell show that your stupid religion is true.

And heres another thing. Science has given us toasters, computers, planes and chocolate pudding, what has religion given us?

e=mc2 therefore sky daddies don't exist

Just when you think you've seen all the arguments against sky daddies you come across another one. This one is a must watch. It also answers the question people keep asking as to why religion and science contradict. To summarise it:

E=MC2
Therefore only matter and energy exist
Therefore god doesn't exist

Only things that follow newton laws are possible
miracles don't follow newtons laws
therefore miracles aren't possible

Give me some evidence

I can't believe how dumb and illogical xians are. I thought it was common knowledge that atheists don't have to prove their lack of belief in god. I thought russel's teapot was so famous now that anyone kenw about it. But no. Some retarded xians who don't see logic when it stares them in the face just don't get it. SO for the millionth time: YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE XIANS AND SO YOUR SILLY BELIEFS ABOUT TALKING SNAKES ARE NOT TRUE.

Imagine no religion

We all know that religion causes wars, violence etc however how do we prove this? Well one trick I've always found works in debates (often stumps people and makes them resort to ad homin attacks) is referring them to Imagine by John Lennon. He is famous and has a lot of respect so his analysis of the situation should win anyone over

Also on the lines of imagine - take a look at this

How Xians dismiss Sourcses that disprove the bible

Several years ago i was explaining to an xian how their illogical belief in the trinity was stolen from plato. They asked me for evidence for this and so after some quick googling I found a reputable historian called Kersey Graves. Did they accept it? No. They ridiculed me and called my source stupid (as you do when you know you've lost a debate) Then more recently I get the xians who tell me hat zeitgeist the movie or wikipedias aren't reliable sources. There really is a worring trend amongst xians to just dismiss my sources as invalid.

So what do xians use as their source? The bible. You know, that book full of talking donkeys, errors and contradictions. Nuff said. Give me kersey graves and wikipedia any day.

Jesus was never crucified

Whilst I was doing my usual trick of browsing Youtube for new arguments I came across this which shows that Jesus was never crucified.

Stupid Dumb Creationists

I appears that snakes once had legs! Yet more evidence for evolution and more difficulties for creationists. Also on the news it appears that they are putting Darwin's first draft of the origin of species online. This should be an invaluable source when debating stupid dumb creationists.

Finally watch Richard Dawlins explain how stupid Francis Collins is here.