the ultimate boeing 474

Richard Dawkins has a section in the god delusion called 'an interlude at Cambridge'Richard Dawkins explains how he presnted his boesing 474 argument infront of a group of theologians and they were stummped and left quibbling over wheater there sky daddy is simple. Clearly if the top theolgoisns are stumped by this argument then it must be a really good one.

Funny Comic Strip

Click here for the origional full size version

Richard Dawkins is not rude...however xians are

Sometimes xians claim that us atheists are rude however all we do is make the odd humerous comment. Infact, Richard Dawkins has only made such remarks against the real enemies of reason such as william lane craig, dinesh d'susa, Boteach, David Robertson. Xians, on the other hand, get their teachings from the bible and are always saying rude things to Richard Dawkins. If you think otherwise then watch this 30 second video.

William stupid craig

Although Im away visiting my parents ive managed to pop on to the net and post a much awaited new blog post.

Aparantly that nincoompoop who debated bill cooke challenged richard dawkins to a debate. You can read about it here

Richard Dawkins obviously turned him down however did write a rebuttal of one of his essays:

One of our commenters on another thread, stevencarrwork, posted a link to this article by the American theologian and Christian apologist William Lane Craig. I read it and found it so dumbfoundingly, staggeringly awful that I wanted to post it again. It is a stunning example of the theological mind at work. And remember, this is NOT an 'extremist', 'fundamentalist', 'picking on the worst case' example. My understanding is that William Lane Craig is a widely respected apologist for the Christian religion. Read his article and rub your eyes to make sure you are not having a bad dream.

Richard

However this is the best thread, I'll share some of the comments about debating william lane craig:

I would rather see Dawkins debate the existence of leprechauns maybe on Jerry Springer

I'd agree. Debating the creationists is like feeding the trolls. People should rise above such pointless behavior.

If this William Lane Craig geezer is so shit-hot, why is it that this here forum is still marching happily along without having had someone demolish us nasty atheists with Craig's arguments?

The same reason he's never sought out my son to debate the existence of Santa Claus!

why do xians write books

why is it that so many people have written books and articles against richard dawkins? similarly the same can be said for the da vinci code. is it because xians are scared that their faith has been demolished and are trying to cover it up? Why is it that atheists dont write loads of responses to xian books? Is it because we know they are rubbish.I can tell if an xian book is rubbish by just looking at who wrote it and the title. Another theory which richard dawkins himself suggests is that they are fleas trying to make money of his back. how dishonest.

A hilarious video - a must watch

I've just seen this hilarious video. I quite metaphorically couldn't stop laughing. It's basically something Richard Dawkins has made which takes the mick out of creationists by comparing creationism to saying that storks deliver babies. It then has people moaning that stork theory isn't taught in schools and the punch line is Richard Dawkins saying 'if storks deliver babies then who delivers the stork?' I really can't see why theists can't see the beauty of he argument 'who made God?' Anyway, watch the video and be prepared for a creat comedy sketch! I would give it 10/10

Stupid Dumb Creationists

I appears that snakes once had legs! Yet more evidence for evolution and more difficulties for creationists. Also on the news it appears that they are putting Darwin's first draft of the origin of species online. This should be an invaluable source when debating stupid dumb creationists.

Finally watch Richard Dawlins explain how stupid Francis Collins is here.