Monday 30 June 2008

William stupid craig

Although Im away visiting my parents ive managed to pop on to the net and post a much awaited new blog post.

Aparantly that nincoompoop who debated bill cooke challenged richard dawkins to a debate. You can read about it here

Richard Dawkins obviously turned him down however did write a rebuttal of one of his essays:

One of our commenters on another thread, stevencarrwork, posted a link to this article by the American theologian and Christian apologist William Lane Craig. I read it and found it so dumbfoundingly, staggeringly awful that I wanted to post it again. It is a stunning example of the theological mind at work. And remember, this is NOT an 'extremist', 'fundamentalist', 'picking on the worst case' example. My understanding is that William Lane Craig is a widely respected apologist for the Christian religion. Read his article and rub your eyes to make sure you are not having a bad dream.

Richard

However this is the best thread, I'll share some of the comments about debating william lane craig:

I would rather see Dawkins debate the existence of leprechauns maybe on Jerry Springer

I'd agree. Debating the creationists is like feeding the trolls. People should rise above such pointless behavior.

If this William Lane Craig geezer is so shit-hot, why is it that this here forum is still marching happily along without having had someone demolish us nasty atheists with Craig's arguments?

The same reason he's never sought out my son to debate the existence of Santa Claus!

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Running low on material? Care to actually give a real argument mikey?

Anonymous said...

Mike, is there an alternate link to the "rebuttal"?
The site says i have to register to read it, and i would rather not.

glad to know your not in a gutter somewhere.

johnny

Mike is Wright said...

You should sign up as then you could post there and we could laugh at you and rip you to pieces..

Anonymous said...

I don't waste much of my time playing with Richard Dawkin's types

Anonymous said...

Mike,
You have my attention here. Are you stopping people from that forum from coming to your blog?

In the past i've spread myself too thin, and will probably make that mistake again, but for right now i'm content to be here.

So...... are you going to point to an alternate link to the "rebuttal"?

johnny

Mike is Wright said...

Go onto Richarddawkins.net and then click on forum. Go onto the richard dawkins section and youll see a thread about william lane craig or something similar. for some reason if you link directly to the thread it needs you to log on however if you go via his website to it you are ok.

Anonymous said...

haha the poster on the Dawkins site thinks that William Lane Craig is a Creationist.