Although Im away visiting my parents ive managed to pop on to the net and post a much awaited new blog post.
Aparantly that nincoompoop who debated bill cooke challenged richard dawkins to a debate. You can read about it here
Richard Dawkins obviously turned him down however did write a rebuttal of one of his essays:
One of our commenters on another thread, stevencarrwork, posted a link to this article by the American theologian and Christian apologist William Lane Craig. I read it and found it so dumbfoundingly, staggeringly awful that I wanted to post it again. It is a stunning example of the theological mind at work. And remember, this is NOT an 'extremist', 'fundamentalist', 'picking on the worst case' example. My understanding is that William Lane Craig is a widely respected apologist for the Christian religion. Read his article and rub your eyes to make sure you are not having a bad dream.
However this is the best thread, I'll share some of the comments about debating william lane craig:
I would rather see Dawkins debate the existence of leprechauns maybe on Jerry Springer
I'd agree. Debating the creationists is like feeding the trolls. People should rise above such pointless behavior.
If this William Lane Craig geezer is so shit-hot, why is it that this here forum is still marching happily along without having had someone demolish us nasty atheists with Craig's arguments?
The same reason he's never sought out my son to debate the existence of Santa Claus!