Anonymous, is there a particular columnist(s) that you think sheds some light on Mike's link? (either pro or con)
To me, this is an interesting "question" Mike brings up. It's something i've read a little about, but i don't have answers, so i'm just another observer for this one.
Hey Mike Trite NOT ONE of those Gospels pre-date the Biblical Gospels. Most of them post-date them by a couple centuries.
The only exception is the Gospel of Thomas, which most date to aprox 140 AD. Roughly 20 years after even the most liberal scholars date the Biblical Gospels.
But there were other reasons why the GoT was exluded.
I am an intelligent young man who likes spreading evidence and reason. I have won employee of the year 5 times showing my excellence and happen to know more about th bible than your average xian.
4 comments:
Anonymous, is there a particular columnist(s) that you think sheds some light on Mike's link? (either pro or con)
To me, this is an interesting "question" Mike brings up. It's something i've read a little about, but i don't have answers, so i'm just another observer for this one.
johnny
Unfortunately it will not let me post the complete length and I cannot delete the post. I apologize.
could you say the columnist's name, and the name of the article (or whatever), so i can look it up on my own?
thanks either way,
johnny
Hey Mike Trite NOT ONE of those Gospels pre-date the Biblical Gospels. Most of them post-date them by a couple centuries.
The only exception is the Gospel of Thomas, which most date to aprox 140 AD. Roughly 20 years after even the most liberal scholars date the Biblical Gospels.
But there were other reasons why the GoT was exluded.
Post a Comment