A blog where I discuss intelligent issues and discuss rationality, logic, evidence and my non belief in sky daddies.
It seems to me that Humphreys is saying that he does not believe the Da Vinci Code is plausible... because, that would mean that his own book would be refuted (i.e. there would be a historical Jesus).If i recall, his words were, "nice hobby".As far as Jesus myth-er, give this a look-see and feel free to share your disagreements:http://www.tektoonics.com/etc/parody/humphreysk01.htmljohnny
sorry, that would be..http://www.tektoonics.com/etc/parody/humphreysk01.html
ok... it cut off the last part.after humphreysk01should be .html
Here is a site that i just found.I don't have time to read it right now, but i'm posting the URL as kinda a bookmark for myself...If someone wants to give it a read and has opposing statements or sources, please feel welcome, because, as FiFi has pointed out so many times, we should question our sources.http://www.christian-thinktank.com/jrthal.htmljohnny
I havent read that particular article, but christianthinktank is a pretty good site, in terms of content anyway. Their webpage layout makes my eyes hurt. In anycase, with regards to interview I love how Humpheries avoided specifics for the entire interview. Also he never did explain how the parrallells prove that 'Jesus never existed.' I could come up with a list of parrallells between Megaman and samus Arin and it wouldnt prove anything except they had some things in common.
Post a Comment